| Team | Matches | Results Breakdown | Match Sets | Match Points | Penalty |
| Played | Won | Lost | 3-0 | 3-1 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 1-3 | 0-3 | Ranking Points* | Won | Lost | Quotient/Ratio | Won | Lost | Quotient/Ratio |
|
1
|
Tchalou CHAPELLE-LEZ-HERLAIMONT
|
2
|
2
|
0
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
6
|
0
|
-
|
150
|
59
| 2,5424 |
|
|
2
|
Olympiada Neapolis NICOSIA
|
2
|
2
|
0
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
6
|
0
|
-
|
150
|
83
| 1,8072 |
|
|
3
|
TJ OSTRAVA
|
2
|
2
|
0
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
6
|
0
|
-
|
150
|
83
| 1,8072 |
|
|
4
|
Ocisa HARO Rioja
|
2
|
2
|
0
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
6
|
0
|
-
|
150
|
90
| 1,6667 |
|
|
5
|
AEK ATHENS
|
2
|
2
|
0
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
6
|
0
|
-
|
150
|
105
| 1,4286 |
|
|
6
|
C.S.M LUGOJ
|
2
|
2
|
0
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
6
|
1
|
6,0000
|
173
|
144
| 1,2014 |
|
|
7
|
Volley DÜDINGEN
|
2
|
2
|
0
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
6
|
2
|
3,0000
|
191
|
152
| 1,2566 |
|
|
8
|
VK Pirane BRUSNO
|
2
|
2
|
0
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
6
|
2
|
3,0000
|
193
|
155
| 1,2452 |
|
|
9
|
HOLTE IF
|
2
|
2
|
0
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
6
|
2
|
3,0000
|
196
|
172
| 1,1395 |
|
|
10
|
SC BALTA
|
2
|
2
|
0
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
6
|
2
|
3,0000
|
184
|
148
| 1,2432 |
|
|
11
|
Øksyl MYRE
|
2
|
2
|
0
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
6
|
3
|
2,0000
|
197
|
189
| 1,0423 |
|
|
12
|
Fundación Cajasol ANDALUCÍA
|
2
|
2
|
0
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
6
|
4
|
1,5000
|
218
|
199
| 1,0955 |
|
|
13
|
VBC CHESEAUX
|
2
|
1
|
1
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
5
|
3
|
1,6667
|
171
|
153
| 1,1176 |
|
|
14
|
GS Panionios NEA SMYRNI
|
2
|
1
|
1
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
5
|
3
|
1,6667
|
179
|
162
| 1,1049 |
|
|
15
|
RAE Spordikool Viaston JÜRI
|
2
|
1
|
1
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
5
|
3
|
1,6667
|
172
|
156
| 1,1026 |
|
|
16
|
Draisma Dynamo APELDOORN
|
2
|
1
|
1
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
5
|
3
|
1,6667
|
171
|
173
| 0,9884 |
|
|
17
|
Fatum NYÍREGYHÁZA
|
2
|
1
|
1
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
4
|
3
|
1,3333
|
176
|
160
| 1,1000 |
|
|
18
|
LP SALO
|
2
|
1
|
1
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
3
|
4
|
0,7500
|
160
|
176
| 0,9091 |
|
|
19
|
VK PROSTEJOV
|
2
|
1
|
1
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
3
|
5
|
0,6000
|
173
|
171
| 1,0117 |
|
|
20
|
Rabotnicki SKOPJE
|
2
|
1
|
1
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
3
|
5
|
0,6000
|
156
|
172
| 0,9070 |
|
|
21
|
AO THIRAS
|
2
|
1
|
1
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
3
|
5
|
0,6000
|
162
|
179
| 0,9050 |
|
|
22
|
Levski SOFIA
|
2
|
1
|
1
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
3
|
5
|
0,6000
|
153
|
171
| 0,8947 |
|
|
23
|
VK Slovan BRATISLAVA
|
2
|
0
|
2
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
4
|
6
|
0,6667
|
199
|
218
| 0,9128 |
|
|
24
|
KAUNAS VDU
|
2
|
0
|
2
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
3
|
6
|
0,5000
|
189
|
197
| 0,9594 |
|
|
25
|
Erzbergm TROFAIACH EISENERZ
|
2
|
0
|
2
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2
|
6
|
0,3333
|
148
|
184
| 0,8043 |
|
|
26
|
VA Uniza ZILINA
|
2
|
0
|
2
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
2
|
6
|
0,3333
|
172
|
196
| 0,8776 |
|
|
27
|
TIF Viking BERGEN
|
2
|
0
|
2
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
2
|
6
|
0,3333
|
155
|
193
| 0,8031 |
|
|
28
|
KV Fer Volley FERIZAJ
|
2
|
0
|
2
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
2
|
6
|
0,3333
|
152
|
191
| 0,7958 |
|
|
29
|
Friso SNEEK
|
2
|
0
|
2
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
1
|
6
|
0,1667
|
144
|
173
| 0,8324 |
|
|
30
|
GZOK Srem SREMSKA MITROVICA
|
2
|
0
|
2
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
0
|
6
|
0,0000
|
105
|
150
| 0,7000 |
|
|
31
|
Buducnost PODGORICA
|
2
|
0
|
2
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
0
|
6
|
0,0000
|
90
|
150
| 0,6000 |
|
|
32
|
Nakovski Volej STRUMICA
|
2
|
0
|
2
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
0
|
6
|
0,0000
|
83
|
150
| 0,5533 |
|
|
33
|
OK BRDA SPLIT
|
2
|
0
|
2
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
0
|
6
|
0,0000
|
83
|
150
| 0,5533 |
|
|
34
|
Fleyr TÓRSHAVN
|
2
|
0
|
2
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
0
|
6
|
0,0000
|
59
|
150
| 0,3933 |
|
Criteria used to determine positions
1st Criteria: Matches Won
2nd Criteria: Ranking Points (*Ranking points are awarded for the following results: 3-0 or 3-1: 3 points, 3-2: 2 points, 2-3: 1 point, 1-3 or 0-3: 0 points)
3rd Criteria: Match Sets Quotient/Ratio
4th Criteria: Match Points Quotient/Ratio
5th Criteria: ‘Head to Head’ Results